WTF? CBS bans comments on Obama stories

Are the people running out of their minds? Or are they just letting panic drive their decisions?

According to CBS blog Public Eye, the CBS website will no longer permit readers to post comments on stories about presidential candidate Barack Obama, but WILL continue to permit comments on stories about other candidates.

Public Eye says:

The reason for the new policy … is that stories about Obama have been attracting too many racist comments.

“It’s very simple,” Mike Sims, director of News and Operations for, told me. “We have our Rules of Engagement. They prohibit personal attacks, especially racist attacks. Stories about Obama have been problematic, and we won’t tolerate it.” says it doesn’t have the resources to pre-screen comments.

Well for goodness sakes, there are a number of ways they could tackle that problem, including filtering technology, community moderators, and requiring commenters to register and earn the right to post without pre-screening.

In the meantime, if CBS can’t handle the commenting system it has created, then it should turn off automatic commenting on ALL candidate stories. To do otherwise, is to risk skewing the political debate. Not to mention the likelihood that those racist comments against Obama will simply be posted on other stories.

Read More

CBS still covering up

Katie Couric’s podcast commentary on Barack Obama [“Is America ready to elect a president who grew up praying in a mosque?”] has been removed from and replaced by an extensively edited text-only version that highlights new wording while giving no indication of what was removed. [jadegreen, however, compares the edited commentary with the original on her blog.]

There’s no explanation for the changes and, just as in the earlier plagiarism case, has disabled comments on this item.

So much for accountability.

Footnote: Andrew Ferguson of the Weekly Standard has an amusing look at the practice of ghostwriting for television.

Read More

CBS bungles the Couric plagiarism case

Three days ago, I commented that CBS appeared to be trying to sweep the Katie Couric broadcast/podcast incident under the carpet.

We now know more of the story, and it again calls into question the ethical standards at CBS, coming in the same week as the company’s obvious reluctance to fire shock jock Don Imus despite his having made racist/sexist insults on the air.

In the Couric case, a producer has been fired for plagiarising the work of a Wall St Journal columnist when she prepared the April 4 edition of Katie’s Notebook, a daily commentary presented by Couric. No surprise there, instant dismissal is the customary and predictable consequence for such a serious breach of journalism standards.

The New York Sun yesterday named the producer who wrote the commentary, although the network won’t confirm the name.

Indeed, secrecy seems to be a theme in this story. The video clip was removed from the site, being replaced with a bizarre Editor’s Note offering a “correction” and claiming there had been an “omission”. Those are quite inappropriate terms to use when describing plagiarism, which is obviously an error of commission. Here’s what the note, from Couric & Co editor Greg Kandra, said:

Correction: The April 4 Notebook was based on a “Moving On” column by Jeffrey Zaslow that ran in The Wall Street Journal on March 15 with the headline, “Of the Places You’ll Go, Is the Library Still One of Them?” Much of the material in the Notebook came from Mr. Zaslow, and we should have acknowledged that at the top of our piece. We offer our sincere apologies for the omission.

The note hints at plagiarism but is sufficiently ambiguous to raise more questions than it answers. Moreover, will not accept comments on the Editor’s Note posting, although it solicits comments on every other posting on the Couric & Co page.

So, after all this, two big questions remain:

  1. Why does characterize this incident as an “omission” instead of as “plagiarism”?
  2. Why does Katie Couric present as her own thoughts material written by other people? She ends each of these commentaries with “That’s a page from my notebook” and they appear on as “posted by Katie Couric”. The implication is that the words are hers.

The answer to the first question can be inferred: some senior journalists at CBS don’t consider themselves to be accountable. They choose to obfuscate and then to deny readers an opportunity to ask questions or make comments about what they’ve done.

As for the second question: well, that’s show business – a theme explored by Timothy Noah at

Read More

Imus fired for racist comments

CBS has sacked radio shock jock Don Imus in a welcome display of good judgment. Pity it took such a huge public outcry.

Rob Hyndman suggests CBS Radio was waiting to gauge the financial repercussions as advertisers deserted the Imus show – and that, unfortunately, is exactly how it appears.

* My earlier post on the Imus affair.

* April 13 update: An audio feature on the Imus controversy from NPR’s On the Media.

* April 14 update: The Wall St Journal details how the decision to take Imus off the air was made. It all began with a blog.

Read More